In the judgment on August 12, choose Okay.S. Gangannavar stated, “In spite of such directions, petitioner’s (Naidu) ventures to trespass the premises of the complainant (sufferer) and try and manhandle the complainant are the intense considerations.”
The choose additional noticed, “In this regard, correct investigations regarding (use of) totally different SIM playing cards or mobiles (by Naidu) are to be investigated into. Because, an individual might purchase any variety of SIM Cards. However, the usage of multiple SIM card or totally different SIM playing cards create suspicion about such contacts.”
“Considering the modus operandi of the petitioner and in consideration of the menace created to complainant (sufferer) and her household, in the meanwhile, it’s discovered not correct to launch the petitioner on bail,” the choose stated.
The sufferer, a local of Hyderabad, bought married eight years in the past. Since then, she has been dwelling in Uchhila along with her husband and seven-year-old daughter. Naidu and the sufferer collectively run an actual property agency. On the morning of July 22, Naidu reportedly entered sufferer’s home and tried to kill her. When she raised alarm, her husband rushed to rescue her. As neighbours assembled, Naidu fled from the place.
In her grievance, the sufferer accused Naidu of mentally torturing her by making cellphone calls from totally different cellphone numbers saying that he was in love along with her and she or he ought to accompany him by divorcing her husband and that he would additionally divorce his spouse. He had additionally known as and threatened to kill her after which committing suicide, she alleged.
The Padubidri police registered her complainant underneath sections 78 (stalking), 329 (4) (legal trespass), 351 (3) (legal intimidation), and 109 (try and homicide) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and arrested him on July 22.
Published – August 16, 2025 06:27 pm IST
Leave a Comment