Court junks plea alleging forgery in inclusion of Sonia Gandhi’s identify in electoral roll

File image of Congress chief Sonia Gandhi. | Photo Credit: PTI

A Delhi court docket on Thursday (September 11, 2025) dismissed a plea looking for motion in opposition to Congress chief Sonia Gandhi, alleging her identify was included within the electoral rolls three years earlier than she turned an Indian citizen. Additional chief judicial Justice of the Peace Vaibhav Chaurasia dismissed the plea. An in depth order is awaited.

On September 10, senior advocate Pavan Narang, showing for the complainant, Vikas Tripathi, stated in January 1980 Ms. Gandhi’s identify was added as a voter of New Delhi constituency when she was not an Indian citizen.

Also Read | Plea seeks FIR in opposition to Sonia Gandhi for getting her identify into electoral rolls three years previous to getting citizenship

“First, it’s a must to fulfill the edge of citizenship, then you’ll turn out to be a resident of an space,” he stated.

Mr. Narang stated in 1980, the proof of residence was in all probability a ration card or a passport.

“If she was a citizen, then why was her identify deleted in 1982? Two names had been deleted then by the election fee, one was of Sanjay Gandhi after he died in a aircraft crash, and the opposite was of Sonia Gandhi,” he stated.

Mr. Narang stated the election fee will need to have discovered one thing fallacious prompting deletion of her identify from the electoral rolls.

On September 4, Mr. Narang stated Ms. Gandhi’s identify was included within the electoral roll as a voter of the New Delhi constituency in 1980, which was deleted in 1982 and once more re-entered in 1983 after she acquired the Indian citizenship.

The plea was filed below Section 175 (4) (energy of Justice of the Peace to order investigation) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, looking for instructions to the police for investigation into the allegation that Gandhi turned an Indian citizen in 1983, however her identify was within the 1980 electoral roll.

He claimed “some forgery” and public authority being “cheated”.

“My restricted request is to both direct the police to register an FIR below the suitable sections. Whether they’re made or not is the area of the police,” he added.

Published – September 11, 2025 04:35 pm IST

  • Related Posts

    Lamborghini seized after Kanpur crash released after 8.5 crore bond payment

    The Lamborghini involved in the high-profile road accident in Kanpur earlier this month has reportedly been released after a bond of ₹8.5 crore was furnished. The accident, which left six…

    Rubio says no Russian oil again, Jaishankar stresses strategic autonomy, question remains over Trump’s tariff order

    Donald Trump’s administration continues to claim that India has committed to stop buying oil from Russia — in return for a tariff-cut and trade deal — with US Secretary of…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Vijay Sethupathys Muthu Alias Kaattaan gets release date; teaser unveiled

    Vijay Sethupathys Muthu Alias Kaattaan gets release date; teaser unveiled

    The Genius of Trees: Read an excerpt from the book by Harriet Rix

    The Genius of Trees: Read an excerpt from the book by Harriet Rix

    Lamborghini seized after Kanpur crash released after 8.5 crore bond payment

    Lamborghini seized after Kanpur crash released after  8.5 crore bond payment

    Prague Masters: Gukesh suffers shock defeat to van Foreest, Aravindh draws with Maghsoodloo

    Prague Masters: Gukesh suffers shock defeat to van Foreest, Aravindh draws with Maghsoodloo

    The Kerala Story 2 box office prediction: Controversy buzz doesn’t help sequel, film to open at less than half of part 1

    The Kerala Story 2 box office prediction: Controversy buzz doesn’t help sequel, film to open at less than half of part 1

    Subedaar: Full music album of Anil Kapoors upcoming actioner out

    Subedaar: Full music album of Anil Kapoors upcoming actioner out