According to ONGC, it had already paid ₹42 lakh for the amount it had produced itself and sought exemption of the approx. ₹18 lakh, for the amount produced by the contractor, as per related provisions again then. File. | Photo Credit: Reuters
Issues regarding non-reconciliation
The oil explorer underlined the first concern pertains to non-reconciliation of the tax demand for the crude oil it had produced and that of a separate manufacturing enhancement contractor (PEC) in the course of the interval. For perspective, the latter pertains to agreements whereby the contractor is required to lift output and improve restoration from depleting or mature oil fields.
According to ONGC, it had already paid ₹42 lakh for the amount it had produced itself and sought exemption of the approx. ₹18 lakh, for the amount produced by the contractor, as per related provisions again then. However, the state-owned explorer acknowledged, the tax authorities “disregarded the cost” made in the direction of their very own manufacturing underlining that the explorer paid it to a unique zonal division of the excise division. Thus, a case of non-reconciliation.
Additionally, the corporate knowledgeable that the exemption profit too has been denied, treating ONGC because the producer for the amount of the PEC as nicely.
Describing the demand as “unsustainable”, it stated, “There is neither any quick cost of responsibility nor any suppression or intent to evade responsibility; therefore, the demand on account of curiosity and penalty is just not sustainable.”
ONGC’s Rajahmundry Asset is unfold throughout 4 districts of Andhra Pradesh, particularly, Krishna, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Konaseema, East Godavari & West Godavari.
Published – October 07, 2025 10:41 pm IST
Leave a Comment