Motion to impeach Justice Swaminathan an attempt to destabilise judiciary: HC advocates

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court. File | Photo Credit: R. ASHOK

The notice to move a motion of impeachment against Justice G.R. Swaminathan by a section of MPs was not only “baseless” but also amounted to crossing the “Lakshman Rekha” drawn between two major pillars of democracy — the legislature and the judiciary — said designated senior advocates and advocates practising before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court here.

In a memorandum submitted to the Lok Sabha Speaker, they said that the impeachment move was nothing but a direct attempt to destabilise the judiciary in the country. It was a “high-handed application of one of the most extraordinary provisions of the Constitution.”

They shared a copy of the letter with the media on Saturday (December 13, 2025). The memorandum stated that the attempt by the legislature was “a brazen breach and misuse of the Constitutional powers” by a section of MPs.

“We refrain from delving into the merits of the dispute that forms the subject matter of the proposed motion as the same is subjudice and presently the subject matter of appeal proceedings before the higher judiciary,” it said.

Having disposed of a whopping 1,26,426 cases, including 73,505 main cases, over a span of eight years (between June 2017 and November 2025), Justice Swaminathan’s work reflected a high degree of impartiality, honesty, and integrity. The memorandum said the MPs had no faith in the noble principles of democracy and the sanctity of the Constitution. It added that the move amounted to proof of sheer bigotry and vested interests opposed to the national interest and the esteemed principle of separation of powers.

The memorandum stressed that the Lok Sabha Speaker should not accept the MPs’ letter to move the motion of impeachment, as Justice Swaminathan was one of the most straightforward, honest, and intelligent judges of the Madras High Court. It urged the Speaker to reject the motion in limine by applying the principles laid down in Articles 124(4) and 217 of the Constitution of India, read with the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968, and to uphold the majesty of law.

Published – December 13, 2025 03:34 pm IST

  • Related Posts

    Lamborghini seized after Kanpur crash released after 8.5 crore bond payment

    The Lamborghini involved in the high-profile road accident in Kanpur earlier this month has reportedly been released after a bond of ₹8.5 crore was furnished. The accident, which left six…

    Rubio says no Russian oil again, Jaishankar stresses strategic autonomy, question remains over Trump’s tariff order

    Donald Trump’s administration continues to claim that India has committed to stop buying oil from Russia — in return for a tariff-cut and trade deal — with US Secretary of…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Vijay Sethupathys Muthu Alias Kaattaan gets release date; teaser unveiled

    Vijay Sethupathys Muthu Alias Kaattaan gets release date; teaser unveiled

    The Genius of Trees: Read an excerpt from the book by Harriet Rix

    The Genius of Trees: Read an excerpt from the book by Harriet Rix

    Lamborghini seized after Kanpur crash released after 8.5 crore bond payment

    Lamborghini seized after Kanpur crash released after  8.5 crore bond payment

    Prague Masters: Gukesh suffers shock defeat to van Foreest, Aravindh draws with Maghsoodloo

    Prague Masters: Gukesh suffers shock defeat to van Foreest, Aravindh draws with Maghsoodloo

    The Kerala Story 2 box office prediction: Controversy buzz doesn’t help sequel, film to open at less than half of part 1

    The Kerala Story 2 box office prediction: Controversy buzz doesn’t help sequel, film to open at less than half of part 1

    Subedaar: Full music album of Anil Kapoors upcoming actioner out

    Subedaar: Full music album of Anil Kapoors upcoming actioner out