Professor convicted of killing husband challenges post-mortem report in HC citing personal information

The homicide case of 2021 got here into limelight after a video of the lady’s arguments within the courtroom not too long ago surfaced on social media. The HC has reserved its judgement on her plea difficult her conviction.

Mamta Pathak labored as a professor of chemistry at a post-graduate school in Chhatarpur, and as per the courtroom, she has consciously refused to just accept authorized assist.

Pathak submitted earlier than the courtroom in April this yr that she was learning her personal case for the final one-and-a-half years.

In the viral video, the lady, who determined to argue her case on her personal based mostly on her information as a chemistry trainer, is seen saying in her defence that it’s “not possible to differentiate between thermal and electric burn marks during a post-mortem “.

She claims {that a} burn mark discovered on a physique must be eliminated and handled with chemical compounds to determine its nature.

The decide then asks her “are you a chemistry professor,” to which she nods within the affirmative and remarks, “I don’t know how the post-mortem has said this is an electric burn mark.”

On April 29 this yr, a division bench of Justice Vivek Agarwal and Justice Devnarayan Mishra reserved the order on Pathak’s enchantment difficult her conviction.

The prosecution’s case was that the appellant murdered her husband Dr Neeraj Pathak , who was additionally a authorities physician, by electrocution.

On April 29, 2021, her husband was discovered lifeless at his home in Chhatarpur, with electrical energy burn marks detected at a number of locations on the physique.

An FIR was registered on May 6, 2021, towards an unidentified particular person on the lady’s criticism. The post-mortem was carried out by a staff of medical doctors, as per the prosecution.

The postmortem indicated Dr Neeraj Pathak died attributable to cardio respiratory failure on account of electrical present at a number of websites.

On the idea of statements recorded in the course of the investigation, Mamta Pathak was made an accused within the case.

After the completion of the investigation, the chargesheet was filed on August 5, 2021.

The lady, whereas difficult her conviction, argued within the courtroom that there was no clinching proof accessible towards her.

In the video which has surfaced, the HC asks her that there are allegations towards her of murdering her husband by electrocution and that the physician who carried out the autopsy has categorically stated there have been indicators of electrical shock.

The lady is seen arguing it’s not doable to distinguish between thermal and electrical burn marks in the course of the autopsy. The burn marks discovered on a physique must be eliminated and handled with chemical compounds to determine its supply, she additional argues.

The decide then asks her, “Are you a chemistry professor?”

The lady replies, “Yes…I don’t know how the postmortem has said this is an electric burn mark.”

The excessive courtroom prolonged the interval of non permanent suspension of her sentence until the date of judgement, which is but to be pronounced, as per the prosecution.

While reserving the order, the HC stated, “as Mamta Pathak submits that her period of temporary suspension of sentence be extended till the date of delivery of judgment, this prayer is accepted. Her period of temporary suspension is extended till the date of judgement.”

This article was generated from an automatic information company feed with out modifications to textual content.