After beating D Gukesh, Hikaru Nakamura mocked the Indian GM for his preparation and likewise felt that he did not need to beat Magnus Carlsen.
Magnus Carlsen from Norway, left, and Gukesh Dommaraju from India throughout their recreation.(AP)
He beat Carlsen and Erigaisi in Round 6 and seven, and regarded like he had discovered a successful components. But he sustained a heavy defeat in opposition to Nakamura.
Also Read: The significance of Gukesh’s first win over Carlsen
Hikaru Nakamura mocks D Gukesh
After the win, Nakamura couldn’t assist himself, mocking Gukesh for his preparation. Speaking to Take Take Take, he stated, “I played something that was very boring, but luckily Gukesh wasn’t ready for it, and he sort of saw some ghosts and went for this whole position with bishop g6 move which I don’t know if it’s losing but for a human, very very tough to play, so it was a very smooth game, very happy.”
The match turned to Nakamura’s facet on transfer 18, when Gukesh opted for an uncommon path,skipping the anticipated transfer, and opted for 18… Rab8. Then it was adopted by 19. Qe4, and with 19… Bg6 pressured, 20.Nxg6 adopted. Then Gukesh’s recapture with the fallacious pawn gave Nakamura an enormous benefit.
The World No. 2 responded with opposite-coloured bishops in attacking positions, and received the sunshine squares underneath his contest, with Gukesh’s bishop additionally standing no probability. Nakamura put immense strain which noticed the reigning World Champion crumble in 50 strikes.
“I’m not sure what happened, whether Gukesh just didn’t know this bishop g6 move, or what exactly it was, but it was very clear to me that, based on the long think, he didn’t like the pawn structure at all,” stated the American.
Meanwhile, in accordance with PTI, Nakamura additionally feels that Gukesh ought to have misplaced to Carlsen, and labelled his play as horrible. “It’s a very strange term, because his result is very good, but if we’re being objective about chess, I think he’s played horribly. He should have lost to Magnus… he was completely lost against Arjun (Erigaisi),” he stated.
“Other than the primary recreation in opposition to me, and possibly the sport in opposition to Wei Yi, sooner or later, he was shedding; even Fabiano (Caruana), he (Gukesh) was additionally shedding in that recreation
“So, it’s totally, very laborious to guage what his play is, however once I take a look at his recreation, one of many large issues that he has, that I’d say Arjun and R. Praggnanandhaa haven’t got, is he is mentally very robust.
“He’s a lot less emotional than the other two players, and that has served him very well, especially in this tournament, so it’s a mixed bag. I think his defensive skills are very good, like in this game, I thought there were probably three or four moments when I was winning, and then I had to still find more moves to convert, so he’s definitely showing very strong strong defensive skills,” he added.
See Less









