Though workers can withdraw as much as 100% of the eligible steadiness within the PF together with worker and employer share throughout their service, a brand new provision has been made that 25% of the contributions in an account needs to be maintained as minimal steadiness always. File. | Photo Credit: Supreet Sapkal

The story up to now: A gathering of the Central Board of Trustees (CBT) of the Employees Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) held in Delhi on October 13 introduced a variety of measures for partial withdrawal of PF funds, which the federal government claimed was to boost the “ease of dwelling” of an EPFO subscriber.

What are the brand new provisions?

The CBT accredited the merger of “13 complicated provisions” for withdrawal right into a single, streamlined rule beneath three classes — important wants (sickness, schooling, marriage), housing wants and particular circumstances. Till now, a member might withdraw solely the worker contribution to the PF and its curiosity starting from 50-100%. Now, the member can withdraw from the employer contribution as effectively. The choice confronted flak from Opposition events, commerce unions and even employers’ organisations. Though workers can withdraw as much as 100% of the eligible steadiness within the PF together with worker and employer share throughout their service, a brand new provision has been made that 25% of the contributions in an account needs to be maintained as minimal steadiness always. The CBT additionally determined to alter the circumstances for availing untimely remaining settlement. If an individual is leaving the job, he/she can not withdraw the complete PF quantity inside two months as is the norm now. Now the individual can withdraw the quantity solely after 12 months. The remaining pension will be withdrawn solely after 36 months, from the current two months. “75% of the quantity will be withdrawn instantly after leaving the job, and the complete quantity will be withdrawn after being unemployed for one 12 months,” the federal government stated.

What is the federal government’s argument?

The authorities stated that frequent withdrawals earlier prompted breaks in service, resulting in rejection of many pension circumstances. It argues that on the time of ultimate settlement, workers have been left with little or no cash. “The above provisions will guarantee continuity of the worker’s service, a greater remaining PF settlement quantity, and monetary safety for the household,” the federal government stated. The authorities additionally claimed that it’ll assist the member to benefit from the greater price of curiosity provided by the EPFO together with compounding advantages to build up a excessive worth retirement corpus. Earlier, withdrawal for marriage or home buy was allowed solely after 5-7 years and the federal government stated now it may be completed after only one 12 months. “Withdrawal limits for schooling or sickness have additionally been made extra versatile. Additionally, in any particular circumstances or emergencies, the complete eligible quantity will be withdrawn as much as twice a 12 months with none questions requested,” it stated.

What is the Opposition saying?

Opposition MPs Manickam Tagore and Saket Gokhale stated in separate statements that the Centre is being merciless to pensioners and EPFO subscribers. “Pensioners and job-losers are being punished for needing their very own financial savings…,” Mr. Tagore stated on social media. Both MPs held that the brand new guidelines will not be for the advantage of employees because the employee must wait to get entry to his or her hard-earned financial savings. Mr. Gokhale known as the brand new rule “draconian” and stated individuals who lose their jobs will be unable to fulfill their bills for a full 12 months when their PF withdrawal is blocked.

What is the place of commerce unions?

The All-India Trade Union Congress General Secretary, Amarjeet Kaur, demanded scrapping of the foundations. “Financial prudence within the face of privation is a impolite joke performed on the unemployed,” she stated. She stated 87% of the EPFO members have lower than ₹1 lakh and 50% of them maintain solely lower than ₹20,000, as per EPFO’s personal knowledge. “The low ranges of monetary stability are instantly attributed to the low wages of majority members. This being the case, holding again 25% of the financial savings as minimal steadiness is nothing however preying on the weak,” she alleged.

Ok.E. Raghunathan, former member of the CBT representing employers, stated the brand new guidelines are deeply regarding and regressive. According to him, PF financial savings will not be meant to be handled as recurring deposits for short-term liquidity. “They are structured to supply dignity and monetary safety on the finish of a employee’s profession. By permitting repeated full withdrawals, we threat leaving tens of millions with negligible retirement financial savings and no fallback when revenue ceases,” he stated, including that the choice will not be empowerment— it’s erosion. “The temptation to withdraw will rise, and the long-term penalties will likely be irreversible. We are successfully dismantling the security web that generations have relied upon,” he added.

Published – October 19, 2025 03:08 am IST