But it is a ‘what’s’ assertion, not a ‘what if’ piece. What is uncontestably true is that Ghatak’s legacy in mainstream Hindi movie is extra palpable, and arguably extra celebrated, than the legacy of Ray and Mrinal Sen, his contemporaries within the so-called holy trinity. Ray will get extra lip service from mainstream Hindi filmmakers, and Sen will get extra nods within the work — as an illustration, in using the narrative voiceover, in in style Hindi movie’s love for self-referencing as we see in Yash Raj and Dharma movies. But that’s one other essay.
There are two the explanation why Ghatak has a extra direct footprint in in style Hindi movie. One is his much-talked about use of melodrama as a type. The different is his stint within the Film and Television Institute of India as a instructor. By accounts obtainable on-line, this was solely over the interval 1965-1966, however clearly it was a potent couple of years given the variety of acknowledgements he acquired from figures reminiscent of Vidhu Vinod Chopra, Sanjay Leela Bhansali and Payal Kapadia. (Kapadia’s documentary A Night of Knowing Nothing contains a mural of Ghatak on the FTII campus.)
Ritwik Ghatak lives on at FTII, Pune. (Courtesy Shamya Dasgupta and Westland Books)
Melodrama reimagined
First, melodrama. Mainstream Hindi movie is taken into account melodramatic, whereas arthouse movie, significantly Indian arthouse formed by post-war Italian neorealism and the French new wave, prefers realism. This, clearly, is an enormous generalisation — Ghatak himself is arthouse but melodramatic — however for now, let it stand. Given this kinship of melodrama, the person’s presence is of course palpable in mainstream Hindi movie, together with these of at the moment.
How do I perceive Ghatak’s use of melodrama? The normal definition of melodrama is a plot the place a lot occurs, together with a reliance on coincidences, and sentiments are overheated, the sum of it veering in the direction of exaggeration. Realism tends in the direction of less complicated, slices-of-everyday life plots. In Ghatak’s best-known work Meghe Dhaka Tara, it isn’t sufficient that the protagonist Neeta (Supriya Choudhury) has to surrender her research, and loses her suitor to her sister to help her Partition refugee household, however she should additionally contract a lethal type of tuberculosis that consumes her, actually.
In Subarnarekha, it isn’t sufficient that the heroine Seeta (Madhabi Mukherjee) is estranged from her beloved brother Ishwar, loses her husband to a tragic accident, and is pressured to take up intercourse work to help herself, but additionally that her very first consumer is identical estranged older brother (by coincidence). This type of heated plot improvement is way nearer to Bollywood.
A nonetheless from Ghatak’s movie ‘Meghe Dhaka Tara’ (1960). (IMDB)
A nonetheless from Ghatak’s movie ‘Subarnarekha’ (1965). (IMDB)
Ghatak pioneered one among Bollywood’s most distinctive tropes — reincarnation — along with his story for Bimal Roy’s Madhumati, the highest-grossing Hindi movie of 1958. The movie itself has had a number of re-incarnations in Bollywood, most prominently Subhash Ghai’s Karz (1980), and partly, Farah Khan’s Om Shanti Om (2007).
A nonetheless from Bimal Roy’s ‘Madhumati’ (1958), written by Ghatak. (IMDB)
‘Karz’ (1980), directed by Subhash Ghai, was a reincarnation story.
‘Om Shanti Om’ (2007), directed by Farah Khan, was a reincarnation story.
Ghai is commonly listed as one among Ghatak’s college students at FTII, which is my second argument for Ghatak’s palpable presence in Bollywood at the moment. His checklist of direct college students is alleged to incorporate Adoor Gopalakrishnan, Mani Kaul, Kumar Shahani, Saeed Akhtar Mirza, and Ghai. But the 2 main administrators who point out him typically are Sanjay Leela Bhansali and Vidhu Vinod Chopra. Did they examine immediately beneath him? Perhaps Chopra, who has mentioned in his interviews that Ghatak named him ‘Bidhu’.
Sound psychology
But their work carries imprints of Ghatak. In Meghe Dhaka Tara, Ghatak used the sound of a whip unforgettably to underline his heroine Neeta’s struggling. When she walks down the steps from her boyfriend’s condominium on sensing the presence of one other girl, there may be the sound of a whip. Incongruent, it will appear. Why can we hear a whip once we ought to hear the sound of steps and even different folks’s voices?
Later, when Neeta breaks down after singing a music, practising for her sister’s nuptials together with her former boyfriend, we hear that whip once more, lashing her repeatedly. This time, the message turns into clear: it’s code to her internal being.
Bollywood filmmakers (from left) Vidhu Vinod Chopra, Sanjay Leela Bhansali and Subhash Ghai had been college students at FTII, Pune. (Getty Images)
In Devdas (2002), Bhansali makes use of the identical sound when Devdas (Shah Rukh Khan) is leaving his ancestral palace as a younger man (by the way, as he’s storming down the steps) to protest his father’s orders. Choosing between his imperious father, whose approval he craves all his life, and his old flame, is for Devdas akin to being lashed.
This is direct Ghatak, who elevated using sound in movie to psychological technique. But there may be additionally oblique Ghatak in Bhansali’s work: his fundamental characters typically die or kill themselves, one thing we see in Ghatak’s Meghe Dhaka Tara, Subarnarekha, Titash Ekti Nadir Naam. Moreover, there may be an emotional streak working to insanity that we see typically in Bhansali’s characters — whether or not Devdas who drinks himself to dying as a result of his father humiliates his love Paro (Aishwarya Rai), or Sameer (Salman Khan) who retains speaking to his long-dead father in Hum Dil De Chuke Sanam (1999), or Peshwa Bajirao I (Ranveer Singh), in Bajirao Mastani (2015), who dies hallucinating in a fever, preventing an imaginary battle after he learns that his mom and elder son Nana Saheb have imprisoned his spouse Mastani. There is in all of them an extreme stubbornness, like Neeta in Meghe Dhaka Tara, who continues to bear her household’s ceaseless calls for with out letting on.
A nonetheless from Sanjay Leela Bhansali’s ‘Hum Dil De Chuke Sanam’. (1999). (IMDB)
There can also be in Bhansali’s work, a charmed place for childhood and its recollections — Annie (Manisha Koirala) remembers her grandmother (the good Helen) and their piano with a lot affection; Devdas and Paro are childhood playmates whose recollections hang-out Devdas; we all know the joys of touching water for the primary time has by no means left Michelle Mcnally (Ayesha Kapur and Rani Mukerji) once we see her delight at a snowflake touching her in Black (2005).
In Meghe Dhaka Tara, the ageing schoolteacher father takes his grownup daughter Neeta out for an early morning outing on her birthday, and her older brother Shankar joins in. The outdated man takes them to a rural idyllic panorama outdoors town, and the reminiscence of happier freer occasions descends upon all of them.
Romance of childhood
Chopra has a penchant for childhood mates turning lovers. In his acclaimed, and to my thoughts, best, movie Parinda, Karan (Anil Kapoor) and Paro (Madhuri Dixit) are childhood mates, who develop into lovers. We see this additionally in Mission Kashmir — when Altaf (Hrithik Roshan) meets Sufiya (Preity Zinta) at an occasion, he references a dialog that they had left incomplete as kids.
A nonetheless from Vidhu Vinod Chopra’s ‘Parinda’ (1989). (IMDB)
A nonetheless from Vidhu Vinod Chopra’s ‘Mission Kashmir’ (2000). (IMDB)
In Ghatak’s Subarnarekha, Sita and Abhiram are foster siblings and childhood playmates, who fall in a love nice sufficient for her to defy her guardian-like elder brother. In Meghe Dhaka Tara, we don’t know exactly when Neeta met her boyfriend Sanat, however he’s her schoolteacher father’s scholar suggesting that the pair knew one another from adolescence. In Bari Theke Paliye, Ghatak pitches your complete movie on the standpoint of the eight-year-old Kanchan.
A nonetheless from Ghatak’s movie ‘Bari Theke Paliye’ (1958). (IMDB)
The youngster is necessary to Ray as effectively — a lot of Pather Panchali is from the boy Apu’s standpoint. But Ray, arguably, wouldn’t see a childhood friendship by the lens of a grand romance. There is one thing essentially melodramatic about that, in that it privileges the emotional over all else.
A nonetheless from Satyajit Ray’s ‘Pather Panchali’ (1955). (IMDB)
Other movie followers will level to extra Ghatak references, remembrances, homages, and holograms. His work and admirers proceed to develop. I’ll finish with a scrumptious anecdote that the National Award-winning movie critic Alaka Sahani wrote in an article titled “A River Named Ritwik” (in The Indian Express). Just a few days earlier than his dying, he consoled his daughter Samhita that his movies can be appreciated after his dying. Like the melodramatic tales he cherished to inform the place justice is difficult to search out on this life, Ghatak portended his personal superb ghost story.
The author is the creator of The Day I Became a Runner, and a National Award-winning movie critic.








