A view of the High Court of Karnataka. | Photo Credit:
“The occasion commenced round 5.30 p.m., and a measured response was taken by curbing the period of the perform. Instead of full termination, a measured method was adopted by permitting the occasion to proceed with considerably curtailed period and enhanced monitoring,” the federal government has mentioned in its standing report submitted to the court docket on June 12.
The report has now turn out to be public as a Division Bench comprising performing Chief Justice V. Kameswar Rao and Justice C.M. Joshi, which had on June 5 suo motu initiated a public curiosity litigation petition on the stampede incident, had on July 8 rejected the federal government’s plea to maintain the report in a sealed cowl whereas stating that the difficulty concerned is neither of nationwide safety nor of privateness rights.
Tactical determination
This tactical determination thought of the evolving floor scenario, crowd psychology, the huge scale of the gathering, and the knowledge asymmetry among the many assembled plenty, the federal government mentioned within the report, which was submitted to the court docket on June 12 in a sealed cowl.
“The threat of large-scale rioting each inside the stadium premises and all through Bengaluru necessitated this cautious balancing method, prioritising total public security over rapid occasion cessation. It is widespread and recognized in legislation and order conditions that cancellation of anticipated occasions can incite the gang tremendously and result in widespread mob violence, as has been seen in a number of occasions the place such selections have been take,” it has been claimed within the report.
The authorities has additionally reiterated its constant stand that the stampede occurred as a result of RCB’s name to followers by means of social media concerning the victory parade and organising the occasion with out acquiring permission as per the legislation.
Intelligence failure
The standing report additionally disclosed that “recognising potential intelligence failures”, the federal government transferred the top of Intelligence (Hemant M. Nimbalkar, Additional Director-General of Police-Intelligence) and appointed a brand new Intelligence chief in his place.
Published – July 17, 2025 08:38 pm IST








