A file picture of Bellandur lake in Bengaluru. KTCDA Amendment Bill 2025 seeks to scale back the buffer zone of water our bodies. | Photo Credit: File picture
“As per the professional’s opinion, the present lake buffer zone of 30 meters is itself inadequate, and the true requirement is almost 300 meters to attain ecosystem steadiness. If something, the buffer zone ought to be elevated, not decreased”Thaawarchand Gehlot Governor, Karnataka
Mr. Gehlot stated that he has acquired objections from the Bengaluru Town Hall affiliation with request to present his assent to the Karnataka Tank Conservation and Development Authority (Amendment) Bill, 2025.
Water physique measurement | Proposed buffer zone | |
<5 guntas | 0 | |
Between 5 guntas and 1 acre | 3 metre | |
Between 1 acre and 10 acres | 6 metre | |
Between 10 acres and 25 acres | 13 metre | |
Between 25 acres and 100 acres | 24 metre | |
> 100 acres | 30 metre | |
As per the Bill, the buffer zone is sought to be eliminated for tanks unfold throughout lower than 5 guntas whereas setting a three-metre buffer for tanks with an space between 5 guntas and one acre, six metres for tanks between one acre and ten acres, 13 metres for tanks between 10 acres and 25 acres, 24 metres for tanks between 25 acres and 100 acres, and 30 metres for tanks which might be greater than 100 acres.
Canals | Existing buffer zone | Proposed buffer zone |
Tertiary | 10 metre | 5 metre |
Secondary | 15 metre | 10 metre |
Primary | 30 metre | 15 metre |
For major canals, the federal government has proposed to deliver down the buffer zone from the present 30 metres to fifteen metres. And for secondary canals from 15 metres to 10 metres and for tertiary canals from 10 metres to 5 metres.
Mr. Gehlot advised the federal government, “As per the professional’s opinion, the present lake buffer zone of 30 meters is itself inadequate, and the true requirement is almost 300 meters to attain ecosystem steadiness. If something, the buffer zone ought to be elevated, not decreased.” He added that the federal government had not consulted an professional committee and other people concerning the implication of this modification.
“It is in violation of the Constitution and settled legislation, and is dangerous for each citizen, impacts the citizen’s proper to water safety and a wholesome surroundings,” he stated.
It is critical to get clarifications from the State Government concerning the points raised by Bengaluru Town Hall and ‘additionally know whether or not this modification will lead to a very adversarial impact’, he acknowledged whereas returning the file to the federal government and directing it to re-submit the file together with clarifications.
Bengaluru Town Hall acknowledged that the affiliation is happy to study that the Governor has returned the modification, which, it claims, ‘threatens the 45,000 lakes in Karnataka’.
“That the State Government may so frivolously try to make amendments which have such large-scale apocalypse-like penalties for each nature and the inhabitants of the State reveals that the federal government shouldn’t be working within the pursuits of the folks of the State. This wants to alter instantly. The authorities must be held accountable,“ stated Sandeep Anirudhan, convenor for Bengaluru Town Hall.
Published – September 16, 2025 02:29 pm IST
Leave a Comment