Pant swung Pant-like, and performed the shot of the collection when he appeared to push Ben Stokes delicately to cowl just for the ball to race to the boundary like a tracer bullet, as Ravi Shastri would say.
Players injured throughout the course of a match returning to the motion are the stuff of folklore. Colin Cowdrey, arriving on the crease along with his arm in a sling, Anil Kumble bowling to and dismissing Brian Lara along with his jaw wired up are justly in that pantheon.
Substitute fielders have been at all times allowed within the legal guidelines of the sport, and until just lately substitute runners too for injured batters. Then, following the loss of life of Phil Hughes on the cricket discipline, a concussion substitute was allowed to bat or bowl. The runner for batters, nonetheless, was not allowed. Following the heroics of Pant and Woakes, there was a cry for substitutes who may substitute gamers injured.
Contrasting views
Former England captain Michael Vaughan has referred to as cricket a ‘dinosaur’ recreation for not permitting damage substitutes, claiming this “devalues the product”. He went on to say — and this can be the nub — “It value England the collection as a result of England obtained to inside six runs of beating India with ten gamers.”
On the opposite hand, present captain Ben Stokes argues that the damage substitute is pointless. If somebody will get injured, its powerful luck. Deal with it, he says, including that there could also be room for manipulation if an damage substitute is allowed.
Few worldwide cricketers undergo a profession with out accidents. These are a part of the sport, like sixes and canine working onto the sphere. Wicketkeepers end with crooked fingers, quick bowlers’ backs insurgent inside a number of years, and infrequently in solely their 40s, gamers develop dodgy knees, and carry different proof of their harsh sporting life.
The regulation on substitutes (Law 2) is without doubt one of the trickier ones. It has been manipulated up to now. In his autobiography, Imran Khan has written a few match in Pakistan within the Eighties, the place one of many groups, realising the character of the wicket substituted gamers after lunch and an entire session of play had been gone by!
Nearly a century earlier than that, when the Lancashire captain Archie Maclaren allowed Sussex to substitute a quick bowler who fell unwell after three overs, he was berated by Wisden for organising a “very harmful precedent.” Cricket is a tricky recreation.
The intriguing case of a substitute who took a wicket occurred in 1982. After quick bowler Gladstone Small had already bowled 15 over for Warwickshire in opposition to Lancashire, he was referred to as up for England obligation as standby. Manager David Brown (who was 40 and had performed 26 Tests for England) was given particular permission to take Small’s place within the eleven.
Brown dismissed wicketkeeper Christopher Scott. The story doesn’t finish there. Small was not wanted by England, then returned to bat, and bowled eleven overs within the second innings.
This might not have been the manipulation Stokes had in thoughts when he mentioned he was in opposition to the concept of an damage substitute (or, as on this case, a ‘nationwide name’ substitute). But he has some extent. Would England have gained the Lord’s Test if Vaughan’s Law had existed, and Shoaib Bashir (who obtained the final wicket bowling with a fractured finger) had made method for an damage substitute?
Cricket is a recreation of strain, and accidents add to the diploma of problem. It is not only the romance of the fallen hero rising to a problem — though as Pant and Woakes confirmed, there may be that too.
There is just too the hazard of batters and fielders turning into that bit extra reckless of their strategy figuring out if they’re injured, a substitute will do their job. The fashionable participant (Stokes) I believe is true, whereas the ex-player (Vaughan), who sees cricket as a “product” has obtained it unsuitable.
Published – August 13, 2025 12:24 am IST









