What is the urgency? Supreme Court refuses pressing itemizing of plea in opposition to India-Pakistan cricket match

The Supreme Court on Thursday (September 11, 2025) declined to urgently hear a petition that sought cancellation of the India–Pakistan cricket match scheduled for September 14 as a part of the Asia Cup T20 event. 

Also Read | Should India proceed to boycott cricket in Pakistan?

The petition, filed by 4 regulation college students, contended that staging the match within the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror assault and Operation Sindoor is “in opposition to nationwide curiosity” and demeans the sacrifices of armed forces and civilians who misplaced their lives within the assault.

When the matter was talked about earlier than a Bench of Justices J.Okay. Maheshwari and Vijay Bishnoi for pressing itemizing, the Bench declined to entertain the plea. “What is the urgency? It’s a match, let or not it’s,” Justice Maheshwari informed the counsel who urged the court docket to record the matter on Friday (September 12).

When the lawyer identified that the match was to be held on Sunday (September 14) and that the petition would in any other case develop into infructuous, the Bench remained unmoved. “Match is that this Sunday? What can we do about that? Let or not it’s. The match ought to go on,” it stated.

Even because the lawyer insisted that the deserves of the case had been immaterial and that it should be heard, the Bench reiterated its refusal.

“Playing with Pakistan sends the other message, that whereas our troopers are sacrificing their lives, we’re celebrating sports activities with the identical nation sheltering terrorists. It may damage the feelings of the households of the victims. The dignity of the nation and safety of residents come earlier than leisure,” the plea, filed by means of advocates Sneha Rani, Abhishek Verma and Md. Anas Chaudhary stated.

The petitioners submitted that cricket can’t be positioned above nationwide curiosity, the lives of residents, or the sacrifices of armed personnel, cautioning that permitting the match to proceed would undermine the morale of each the armed forces and the general public. “The nation’s dignity and safety should outweigh issues of leisure and income technology,” they stated.

In addition to in search of cancellation of the match, the scholars urged the Ministry of Youth Affairs to implement the National Sports Governance Act, 2025, and to deliver “season ball” cricket inside the ambit of a recognised National Sports Federation.

They additional submitted that the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), which has been arrayed as a respondent, have to be introduced below the ambit of the Sports Ministry. “It is excessive time that the BCCI is introduced below the Ministry of Youth Affairs & Sports. Once the National Sports Governance Act, 2025, is applied, BCCI will essentially need to fall below the National Sports Board created below the Act,” the petitioners stated.