He reached the workplace of the central probe company in central Delhi round 11 a.m.
The ED will report the assertion of the 66-year-old businessman beneath the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).
The summons come after the company carried out searches at 35 premises of fifty corporations and 25 folks, together with executives of his enterprise group, in Mumbai on July 24.
Allegations of ‘gross violations’ in Yes Bank mortgage approvals
The motion pertains to alleged monetary irregularities and collective mortgage “diversion” pegged at greater than ₹17,000 crore by a number of group corporations of Anil Ambani, together with Reliance Infrastructure (R Infra).
The first allegation pertains to “illegal” mortgage diversion of round ₹3,000 crore, given by the Yes Bank to the group corporations of Ambani between 2017 and 2019.
The ED suspects, the sources stated, that simply earlier than the mortgage was granted, Yes Bank promoters “received” cash of their corporations.
The company is investigating this nexus of “bribe” and the mortgage.
The sources stated the ED can also be probing allegations of “gross violations” in Yes Bank mortgage approvals to those corporations, together with costs corresponding to back-dated credit score approval memorandums and investments proposed with none due diligence/credit score evaluation in violation of the financial institution’s credit score coverage.
The loans are alleged to have been “diverted” to many group corporations and “shell” (bogus) corporations by the entities concerned.
The company can also be taking a look at some situations of loans given to entities with weak financials, an absence of correct documentation of loans and due diligence, debtors having widespread addresses and customary administrators of their corporations, and many others., in keeping with the sources. The cash laundering case stems from no less than two CBI FIRs and experiences shared by National Housing Bank, SEBI, National Financial Reporting Authority and Bank of Baroda with the ED, they’d stated.
Siphoning off public cash
These experiences, the sources stated, point out there was a “well-planned and thought after scheme” to divert or siphon off public cash by dishonest banks, shareholders, traders and different public establishments.
The different allegation being probed by the ED, on the idea of a SEBI report, is that R Infra “diverted” funds disguised as inter-corporate deposits (ICDs) to Reliance Group corporations by means of an organization named CLE. It is alleged that R Infra didn’t disclose CLE as its “related party” to keep away from approvals from shareholders and audit panels.
A Reliance Group spokesperson had denied any wrongdoing and stated in an announcement that the allegation relating to alleged diversion of ₹10,000 crore to an undisclosed get together was a 10-year-old matter and the corporate had said in its monetary statements that its publicity was solely round ₹6,500 crore.
Reliance Infrastructure had publicly disclosed this matter on February 9, 2025, almost six months in the past, the assertion stated. “Through mandatory mediation proceedings conducted by a retired Supreme Court judge and the mediation award filed before the Hon’ble Bombay High Court, Reliance Infrastructure arrived at a settlement to recover its 1005 exposure of ₹6,500 crore,” it stated.
The firm added that Ambani was not on the board of R Infra since greater than three years (March 2022).
The Union authorities had knowledgeable Parliament not too long ago that the State Bank of India has categorised RCOM together with Ambani as “fraud” and was additionally within the technique of lodging a grievance with the CBI.
A financial institution mortgage “fraud” of greater than ₹1,050 crore between RCOM and Canara Bank can also be beneath the ED scanner, aside from some “undisclosed” overseas financial institution accounts and property, the sources stated.
Reliance Mutual Fund can also be said to have invested ₹2,850 crore in AT-1 bonds, and a “quid pro quo” is suspected right here by the company.
Additional Tier 1 (AT-1) are perpetual bonds issued by banks to extend their capital base, and they’re riskier than conventional bonds, having larger rates of interest.









