parliament-safety-breach-case:-delhi-hc-seeks-police-reply-on-bail-plea-of-two-accused parliament-safety-breach-case:-delhi-hc-seeks-police-reply-on-bail-plea-of-two-accused

Parliament safety breach case: Delhi HC seeks police reply on bail plea of two accused

Accused leaping into the Lok Sabha chamber from media gallery and opening colored smoke canisters. | Photo Credit: FILE PHOTO

The Delhi High Court on Thursday requested Delhi Police to answer a bail plea of two accused within the December 2023 Parliament safety breach case.

During the listening to, the counsel for the accused – Sagar Sharma and Manoranjan D – instructed a Division Bench of Justices Vivek Chaudhary and Shalinder Kaur that the act of opening smoke canisters inside Parliament whereas sloganeering “didn’t quantity to terrorist act” because the smoke was not obnoxious and the intention of the accused was to solely “spotlight unemployment and never create terror”.

The Bench, nonetheless, remarked, “The finest technique to create terror in India is to disrupt Parliament. You disrupted Parliament.”

It requested the Delhi Police to file a standing report on Mr. Sharma’s bail plea and posted the listening to for October 8, when it might additionally take up Mr. Manoranjan D’s petition, for which it had issued a discover earlier.

The duo had challenged a trial court docket’s order denying them bail.

Mr. Sharma contended that he was entitled to be launched on bail on the grounds of parity with the opposite two accused who have been already on bail. Mr. Manoranjan D known as the allegations towards him “obscure” and alleged that Delhi Police had “wrongly attributed” the cost underneath the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act towards him.

The Bench mentioned there was no parity since these granted bail had protested outdoors Parliament, whereas the current accused have been inside it.

In a serious safety breach on the anniversary of the 2001 Parliament terror assault on December 13, 2023, accused Mr. Sharma and Mr. Manoranjan D allegedly jumped into the Lok Sabha chamber from the general public gallery throughout Zero Hour, opened canisters stuffed with yellow gasoline, and sloganeered earlier than some MPs overpowered them.

Around the identical time, the opposite two accused – Amol Shinde and Neelam Azad – allegedly opened colored gasoline canisters outdoors the Parliament premises and raised slogans.

The High Court granted bail to Ms. Azad and one other accused, Mahesh Kumawat, in July.

Published – July 25, 2025 01:18 am IST

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *