To avoid paying alimony and child support, man claimed he was ... To avoid paying alimony and child support, man claimed he was ...

Man fakes being jobless to dodge alimony, court docket orders him to pay 90,000 a month to spouse

Jul 01, 2025 10:27 PM IST

A Jharkhand man falsely claimed unemployment to evade alimony however was uncovered by an RTI revealing an revenue of ₹27 lakh yearly.

A person in Jharkhand tried to flee alimony and youngster help funds by falsely claiming he was unemployed, however a Right to Information (RTI) request uncovered his precise revenue, main the High Court to order him to pay almost 1 lakh monthly, a report by the Indian Express revealed.

In 2023, the girl challenged a household court docket’s earlier choice awarding her a one-time alimony of 12 lakh.

The Jharkhand High Court granted 90,000 monthly in upkeep to the person’s ex-wife and their son, who’s autistic. This consists of 50,000 for the spouse and 40,000 for the kid’s care and remedy wants.

An RTI question revealed that the person earned 27 lakh yearly whereas working at an IT agency in Mumbai, instantly contradicting the affidavit he had submitted in court docket claiming he was jobless.

The case

In 2023, the girl challenged a household court docket’s earlier choice awarding her a one-time alimony of 12 lakh. She argued the quantity was inadequate, particularly given her son’s particular wants and long-term remedy necessities.

She additionally alleged home abuse, dowry calls for, together with money and an SUV, and abandonment. Her ex-husband later lower off contact and refused monetary help.

While his affidavit said he was unemployed, the RTI from the Income Tax Department proved he earned 2.3 lakh monthly in 2023.

‘An ethical failure’

The High Court criticised the decrease court docket for accepting the person’s declare of unemployment with out verification and acknowledged the full-time caregiving burden on the mom.

In its remarks, the court docket said: “Desertion of spouse is one factor, however desertion of an autistic youngster isn’t solely an ethical failure however a authorized default.”

Leave a Reply