Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge speaks during an interview with PTI, in Chennai, Tuesday, April 21, 2026. (PTI)
The Congress party sought time to file a detailed response within one week while filing the summary reply.
“We are in receipt of two notices with the same number, F. No. 437/TNLA/2026/SS-I (MCC Complaint), both dated 22.04.2026 and signed by two different officials of the Commission,” Congress general secretary in-charge communications Jairam Ramesh said in a letter to Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.
If one of the notices was withdrawn, there is no mention of it in either of the notices, he said.
Also read: Rape in Alwar, murder in Delhi, arrest in Dwarka: What unfolded in IRS officer’s daughter case in 48 hours
“We would like to draw your attention to the fact that one of the notices even mentions that the so-called violation of the model code of conduct was based on a complaint by Shri Derek O’Brien of the All India Trinamool Congress dated 21.04.2026. The other notice, which is also uploaded on your website, has strangely dropped his name as the complainant,” Ramesh said.
Also read: Another Nashik ‘godman’ accused of rape, threatened woman with ‘divine power’; case filed
Ramesh in the response letter flagged the short time given to Kharge to reply to the charges levelled against him in the notice amid busy election schedule. “You would have been aware this is certainly not sufficient time given that the Congress president is in the middle of multiple campaigns,” the letter said further.
‘Formality, not natural justice’
It almost seems the CEC is executing the notice as a formality rather than as an act in discharge of natural justice, Ramesh said.
“We seek time to file a detailed response within one week and also for a senior delegation of Congress leaders to present the same,” he said.
In the summary response, Ramesh said the comments have already been clarified subsequently by Kharge himself.
