udf-spotlights-courts-remark-{that-a}-superpower-authority-managed-vigilance-as-an-indictment-of-cmo udf-spotlights-courts-remark-{that-a}-superpower-authority-managed-vigilance-as-an-indictment-of-cmo

UDF spotlights courts remark {that a} superpower authority managed Vigilance as an indictment of CMO

The Congress-led United Democratic Front (UDF) on Friday argued {that a} particular courtroom’s damning repudiation of the Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau (VACB)‘s try to absolve former Additional Director General of Police, Law and Order, M.R. Ajith Kumar vindicated the Opposition’s place {that a} cabal of conspirators on the apex of the Chief Minister’s Office (CMO) subverted legislation enforcement for his or her vested pursuits. 

Leader of the Opposition V.D. Satheesan acknowledged that the clique operated past the pale of legislation and legislative scrutiny. 

Mr. Satheesan stated the courtroom had shone a light-weight on how the coterie managed the police, together with the VACB. He highlighted the courtroom’s observations within the high-profile case. 

Inquiry Commissioner and Special Judge A. Manoj had written that the “courtroom can not consider that the officers of the Vigilance division and the superpower authority controlling them” violated the Supreme Court’s stricture on investigating official corruption. 

Mr. Satheesan additionally seized upon a damning remark of the courtroom to criticise the CMO. The courtroom acknowledged that the “information of the case recommend that there’s an invisible penetration by somebody into the inquiry that results in the preparation of a report beneficial to the suspect, who holds a excessive place within the Police division. The inquiry report is a subservient report ready for many who want experiences like the current one.” 

The decide flagged an “obvious try” on the inquiry’s outset to supersede the statutory provisions of the Vigilance Manual and Supreme Court judgments, together with the establishing Lalithakumari case.

The decide wrote that the investigation officer juggled information and statements to absolve the accused officer of the alleged crime of disproportionate property accumulation. 

Mr. Satheesan stated the courtroom’s resolution to conduct an inquiry by itself was an indictment of the Left Department Front (LDF) and its Home and Vigilance departments. He acknowledged the courtroom had signalled an evident lack of belief within the VACB ruled by Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan. 

Mr. Satheesan alleged that the VACB’s clear chit to Mr. Ajith Kumar was a quid professional quo for the rating officer performing because the Communist Party of India (Marxist) [CPI(M)]’s secret emissary to the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh. He alleged that Mr. Vijayan had protected the officer, regardless of him holding secret parleys with the RSS’ nationwide management. 

Published – August 15, 2025 09:27 pm IST

Leave a Reply